How Loneliness Affects Brain Health

What we never learned in medical school — and why the brain pays the price.

Social connection and health barely feature in the medical school curriculum, and they get little mention in mainstream psychiatric or gerontological training either. That's a strange gap, because once you start looking, loneliness turns out to be one of the more powerful — and most overlooked — influences on brain health we have.

What Loneliness Actually Is

Loneliness is not the same as being alone. It is not voluntary solitude, and it is not simply a lack of company. It is subjective, unpleasant, and often painful — a dissatisfaction with the quality or quantity of one's social relationships, regardless of how many people are actually around. As the psychiatrist Frieda Fromm-Reichmann put it in 1959, loneliness can be "such a frightening and painful experience that people will do practically everything to avoid it." John Bowlby, writing in 1973, saw it differently but just as seriously — as a "proximity-promoting mechanism necessary for the survival of the species": a signal, built into us by evolution, that something important is missing.

Sociologist Robert Weiss's 1973 typology usefully splits loneliness into two forms. Social loneliness is the absence of a wider network — a sense of marginalisation, boredom, and exclusion. Emotional loneliness is the absence of a single close confidant, and tends to come with hypervigilance, oversensitivity to rejection, and lower empathy. The two often overlap, but they're not the same experience, and they don't respond to the same fixes.

Loneliness Is Not the Same as Isolation

Isolation is objectively measurable — do you live alone, how large is your network, how often do you see people. Loneliness is the subjective experience layered on top of that. The two commonly co-occur and isolation is a genuine risk factor for loneliness, but they can also pull apart entirely: it's entirely possible to feel lonely inside a large, functioning social network — a kind of social asymmetry where the connections are present but don't feel like enough. Because the two aren't interchangeable, and because the health risks they carry aren't always the same, both need to be considered separately when assessing someone's risk.

Who Is at Risk

Certain life circumstances raise the risk of loneliness: being widowed, living alone, physical disability, a poor social network, being a caregiver, retirement, bereavement, mental illness, lower socioeconomic status, and — in most studies — being female (Golden et al., 2009). Loneliness also peaks at three distinct points across the life course: around age 30, again in the mid-to-late 50s, and again past 80.

There's even a genetic component. A large 2018 genetic study found a shared genetic link between raised BMI and increased susceptibility to both loneliness and depressive symptoms — suggesting that, for some people, vulnerability to loneliness is partly written into their biology before circumstance ever plays a role (Day et al., 2018).

Loneliness is more common than most people assume: roughly one in three people over 50 report feeling lonely at least some of the time, around 10% often, and 5–10% at a level severe enough to be clinically significant.

Why It Matters for Health Generally

Long before the neuroscience caught up, epidemiologists had already made the case. A landmark 1988 paper in Science concluded that "the magnitude of risk associated with [social relationships] is comparable with that of cigarette smoking and other major biomedical and psychosocial risk factors" (House, Landis & Umberson, 1988). A large 2010 meta-analysis went further: the increased odds of dying associated with poor social relationships were similar to the risk from light smoking, and greater than the risks from hypertension or obesity (Holt-Lunstad et al., 2010).

Loneliness and isolation are associated with a strikingly wide range of poor outcomes: increased mortality, frailty, heart attack, stroke, poorer quality of life, sleep problems, dementia, psychosis, and depression. Some of this runs through measurable physiology — loneliness is linked to raised blood pressure, sleep fragmentation, elevated inflammatory markers, and raised cortisol.

What Loneliness Does to the Brain

The most interesting recent evidence is neurobiological. In mice, a specific brain region — the dorsal raphe nucleus's dopamine neurons — appears to represent the subjective experience of social isolation and the motivational drive to reconnect (Matthews et al.2016). In humans, acute social isolation activates a similar midbrain reward circuit (the SN/VTA dopamine system) that also governs cravings for food — people who had been isolated for just ten hours showed a "social craving" response strikingly similar to hunger, and, tellingly, people who already scored as more chronically lonely showed a blunted version of that response (Tomova et al., Nature Neuroscience).

The structural effects are just as striking. In mice, social isolation reduces brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), raises cortisol, and decreases the size and number of neurons in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. In humans, a study of Antarctic expeditioners — about as close to a real-world isolation experiment as research ethics allow — found measurable reductions in both brain volume and BDNF after a prolonged period of extreme social and environmental isolation (Stahn et al., 2019, NEJM). And in a large UK Biobank study, people who felt more socially isolated showed increased connectivity within the brain's default mode network — the network associated with rumination, inward focus, and self-referential thought, and one that behaves similarly in depression (Spreng et al., 2020, Nature Communications).

Loneliness and Brain Health: Emotional and Cognitive Domains

Brain health spans emotional and cognitive domains, and loneliness touches both.

On the emotional side, loneliness is a well-established risk factor for depression, and it predicts hopelessness independently. In our own study of widowhood, the elevated depression risk long associated with losing a spouse was substantially explained by the higher prevalence of loneliness that accompanies it — suggesting that addressing loneliness directly could help prevent some of that depression (Golden et al., 2009). Loneliness also has a bidirectional relationship with psychosis: mistrust and hypervigilance feed loneliness, and loneliness feeds paranoia; experimentally reducing loneliness has been shown to reduce paranoia in turn (Lamster et al., 2016). And loneliness is consistently associated with lower empathy and lower wisdom, since the prosocial components of wisdom — empathy and compassion — are themselves closely tied to how connected a person feels (Beadle et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2019, 2020).

On the cognitive side, lonely people show lower global cognition, slower processing speed, and poorer visual memory, along with steeper cognitive decline over time — and the relationship runs in both directions, with cognitive decline also predicting later loneliness (O'Luanaigh & Lawlor, 2012; Donovan et al., 2017). One of the more striking findings is that cognitively normal older adults who reported loneliness had a higher amyloid burden on imaging, raising the possibility that loneliness isn't just a consequence of decline but an early marker of it (Donovan et al., 2016). At a population level, a major review found that low social participation, infrequent social contact, and loneliness each independently raised dementia risk by 40–60% — a magnitude comparable to low educational attainment, physical inactivity, and late-life depression (Kuiper et al., 2015).

Not every study agrees on the details. Some cohorts find loneliness itself predicts dementia while isolation does not (Holwerda et al., 2014; Sutin et al., 2018; Wilson et al., 2007); at least one finds the opposite, that isolation rather than loneliness carries the dementia risk (Penninkilampi et al., 2018). That inconsistency is worth being honest about — but across the evidence as a whole, social engagement is increasingly treated as a genuinely modifiable risk factor for dementia, one that can help build cognitive reserve rather than simply reflecting decline that's already underway.

The COVID-19 Natural Experiment

COVID-19 gave us an unplanned, large-scale experiment in what happens when social connection is severely and suddenly restricted. In Ireland, the proportion of adults reporting feeling lonely all or most of the time rose from 4% in 2018 to 14% by November 2020 — more than a threefold increase, and worst among younger and middle-aged adults rather than, as many assumed, older people living alone. The consequences went beyond distress and anxiety: people living with dementia and their caregivers saw increases in loneliness, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and cognitive decline during lockdown periods, and social restriction was independently associated with faster decline in people with dementia (Tondo et al., 2021). One study found that cognitive function measurably worsened during lockdown and improved again as restrictions lifted — a pattern consistent with the cognitive reserve hypothesis, where social engagement functions as a resource the brain can draw down and rebuild (Ingram et al., 2021).

Targeting Loneliness for Brain Health

The encouraging part of this evidence is that loneliness, unlike age or genetics, is something we can act on — at every level of prevention. At a primary level, that means promoting social connection through the structures of everyday life: transport, housing, education, and equity, designing a society that makes connection easier by default. At a secondary level, it means identifying at-risk groups — the newly widowed, new caregivers, people who've just retired — and training professionals to recognise and act on the risk before it becomes entrenched. At a tertiary level, it means specific interventions for people already experiencing loneliness: befriending schemes, social prescribing, and targeted approaches like CBT.

Addressing loneliness isn't just about avoiding harm — it has real upside for brain health: lower depression risk, improved cognitive processing, a shift away from the negative, mistrustful mindset that chronic loneliness produces, and cognitive reserve built over time. But one size doesn't fit all. Effective interventions need to account for the real barriers some lonely people face — mistrust, negative social bias, low empathy — and lean into facilitators like empathy and compassion training or structured peer relationship-building, rather than assuming a single programme works for everyone.

Take-Home Message

Targeting loneliness and social isolation — directly or indirectly — has real potential to build cognitive reserve and improve brain health outcomes. It deserves the same seriousness we give to blood pressure, diabetes, or physical activity — not as a soft or sentimental concern, but as a genuine, modifiable brain health risk.

References

Beadle, J. N., et al. (2012). [Empathy, wisdom and social functioning in ageing.]

Day, F. R., et al. (2018). Genetic link between raised body mass index and increased susceptibility to loneliness. Nature Communications.

Donovan, N. J., et al. (2016). Association of higher cortical amyloid burden with loneliness in cognitively normal older adults.

Donovan, N. J., et al. (2017). Loneliness, depression and cognitive function in older U.S. adults.

Golden, J., et al. (2009). Loneliness, social support networks, mood and wellbeing in community-dwelling elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLOS Medicine.

House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241(4865), 540–545.

Kuiper, J. S., et al. (2015). Social relationships and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Ageing Research Reviews.

Lamster, F., et al. (2016). Loneliness and paranoia. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry.

O'Luanaigh, C., O'Connell, H., Chin, A-V., et al., & Lawlor, B. A. (2012). Loneliness and cognition in older people: The Dublin Healthy Ageing study. Aging & Mental Health, 16(3), 347–352.

Spreng, R. N., et al. (2020). The default network of the human brain is associated with perceived social isolation. Nature Communications, 11, 6393.

Stahn, A. C., et al. (2019). Brain changes in response to long-term isolation and confinement. New England Journal of Medicine.

Tomova, L., et al. Acute social isolation evokes midbrain craving responses similar to hunger. Nature Neuroscience.

Tondo, G., et al. (2021). Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with dementia: cognitive decline and social restriction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 4285.

Impact of Isolation and Loneliness on Brain Health and What Actually Helps

 

Continued from Parts One of The Lonely Brain series.

Parts One of this series looked at loneliness as a general health and dementia risk factor, and at what the neuroscience tells us about how isolation changes the brain. Here, we narrow the focus to something more clinically urgent: what's actually happening with loneliness and isolation in people who already have — or are at risk of — mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia, and, most importantly, what the evidence says actually helps.

The Drive for Social Connection

People need people. The drive for social connection is part of our innate biology — when we feel isolated, excluded, or disconnected, we feel the pain of loneliness, and that pain is precisely what pushes us back toward connection. When connection isn't achieved, or isolation persists, the cycle simply continues.

Defining Social Connection Precisely

Social connection is the structure, function, and quality of a person's relationships and interactions, and it's assessed through two distinct constructs. Social isolation is quantitative and objective: network size, number and frequency of contacts, and the type of contact (family, friends, neighbours). Loneliness is qualitative and subjective: how satisfied a person feels with their relationships, regardless of how many they have. The two commonly co-occur and overlap in how they're measured, but the health risks they carry aren't interchangeable — which is why good research, and good clinical assessment, treats them as two separate things to check. In practice, the more subjective instruments (the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale, the UCLA Loneliness Scale) measure loneliness, while more objective instruments (such as social network scales) measure isolation.

Not All Social Activity Works the Same Way

It's worth being precise about social activity too, since the term covers very different things. A book club, a day centre, and an exercise group are all "social activities," but they aren't interchangeable in their effects. Passive participation or attendance is different from true engagement, which may carry a more meaningful cognitive benefit. Group settings may affect social connection more than solitary ones. And activities that are creative and cognitively stimulating appear to benefit brain health more than passive activity does — which is exactly why interpreting social intervention research is so difficult: results depend heavily on what kind of activity was actually studied, and what precisely it changed. The single "active ingredient" in a beneficial social activity is still not well understood.

Isolation and Loneliness as Independent Risk Factors

Loneliness and social isolation are each independently linked, in numerous observational studies, to a higher risk of cognitive decline, MCI, and dementia — independently meaning that they need to be assessed as two separate risks, not folded into one. Loneliness alone is associated with roughly a 30% increased risk of developing dementia (Luchetti et al., 2024, in a meta-analysis drawing on more than 600,000 individuals); living alone carries a similar increase in risk (Desai et al.). Put in context, the risk contributed by social isolation and loneliness is comparable to, or greater than, the risk from obesity, hypertension, diabetes, or physical inactivity — all well-established, well-accepted dementia risk factors. On the positive side, strong social connection and good-quality relationships appear genuinely protective against cognitive decline and dementia.

How Common Is This in MCI and Dementia?

Among people already living with MCI or dementia, around 40% report loneliness, and up to 60% experience social isolation (Hajek & Koenig, 2025).

Cause or Effect? Probably Both

The relationship is very likely bidirectional — a double-edged sword. Isolation and loneliness raise the risk of developing MCI and dementia, but cognitive decline also predisposes people toward becoming lonely and isolated in turn. In the Harvard Aging Brain Study, higher amyloid burden was linked to the presence of loneliness, particularly in people who carried the ApoE4 genetic risk variant (Donovan et al., 2016) — a striking hint that loneliness can be an early marker of pathology already underway, not simply its consequence. Cognitive decline itself is associated with increased social withdrawal, self-isolation, stigma, depression, and anxiety, and anxiety and depressive symptoms in MCI are common, predict faster progression, and further impact cognitive function in their own right.

Impact on Cognition and Healthcare Use

Loneliness and isolation are associated with poorer performance across global cognition, recall, attention, and executive function (Lee et al., 2025; Evans et al., 2018; O'Luanaigh & Lawlor, 2012), and may accelerate the rate of cognitive decline itself (Hale et al., 2025). Conversely, good social connection — living with others, weekly community group engagement, regular contact with family and friends, and simply not feeling lonely — is associated with slower cognitive decline (Santini et al., 2022 — worth double-checking this author against your source notes). Isolation and loneliness also carry a real cost to health systems: they're linked to increased emergency room visits, hospitalisation, and mortality in people with dementia and MCI (Bartley et al., 2024; Pomeroy et al., 2024), and loneliness among residents of supported living facilities is independently linked to increased ER visits (Chamberlain et al., 2022).

Why Might This Happen? Four Candidate Mechanisms

The exact mechanism remains unclear, but several hypotheses are plausible and not mutually exclusive. Reduced cognitive reserve is one: without cognitive and social stimulation, brain plasticity and reserve diminish, raising the risk of decline. Depression is another: loneliness and isolation raise the risk of depression, which is itself an independent dementia risk factor. Poorer health behaviours play a role too — people who are lonely or isolated tend to smoke more, eat worse, drink more, exercise less, and find it harder to access healthcare, all of which independently raise cognitive risk. And there may be a direct biological pathway, through HPA-axis activation and raised cortisol, immune changes, and reduced neurotrophic support — the same biology covered in more depth in Part One of this series.

Targeting Social Connection: Three Levels of Prevention

The encouraging news is that this is genuinely actionable, at three distinct levels.

Primary prevention aims to reduce the overall incidence of MCI and dementia in the general older population. Social engagement is one of the Lancet Commission's 14 modifiable risk factors for dementia at a population level, and observational studies consistently link high social activity to lower MCI incidence and later onset. The challenge is that large-scale, population-level social interventions are genuinely hard to design, implement, and measure — real primary prevention requires cross-sector collaboration across the built environment, education, health, and transport, which is difficult but necessary if population-level risk is to fall.

Secondary prevention targets people already at risk or already showing MCI, aiming to slow progression. Most major lifestyle intervention trials in this space — the FINGER study, the US POINTER study — are multi-modal, combining vascular risk reduction, cognitive training, exercise, and diet alongside social activity, which makes it genuinely hard to isolate how much of the benefit comes from the social component specifically. Population-based studies (such as MYHAT) have found that social engagement is associated with slower progression from MCI to more severe impairment — though it's equally possible that reduced engagement is simply an early marker of the underlying pathology rather than a cause of its progression. We need trials that isolate social intervention specifically to answer this properly.

Tertiary prevention applies social interventions directly in people already living with MCI or dementia, aiming to improve cognition and quality of life. Home-based and community-delivered interventions show real potential here, though they're harder to run well because of associated behavioural symptoms and caregiver support needs — adapting the environment and increasing support to overcome these barriers to participation is essential if these studies are to succeed.

Interventions That Actually Show Promise

A number of specific approaches now have real evidence behind them. Volunteer support and befriending schemes can alleviate loneliness and improve mood in older people (Lawlor et al., 2014 — worth confirming this citation against your own records). Social interventions such as chatting groups, music, and group-based arts and crafts can improve global cognition in older adults (Siette et al., 2025). Cognitive stimulation therapy is perhaps the most promising single intervention: it improves cognitive function and alleviates depression in people with MCI, and improves both cognition and quality of life in mild-to-moderate dementia (Chen et al., 2025; Desai et al., 2024). Creative arts, cultural activities, and arts-based interventions more broadly may improve global cognition and behaviour in people with dementia (Zhu et al., 2025) — evidence that connects directly to the arts-and-brain-health work covered elsewhere on this site. And exercise groups and resistance training may slow cognitive decline in dementia, with multi-component exercise programmes appearing especially effective in MCI specifically (Huang et al., 2022).

Conclusions

Loneliness and isolation are important, modifiable risk factors — both for developing MCI and dementia, and for the outcomes of people already living with cognitive impairment. Addressing them properly means thinking at every level at once: population, community, and individual. What's still missing is the scale and rigour of the evidence itself — we need larger, longer randomised controlled trials of social interventions, with careful attention to methodology, inclusion criteria, and outcome measurement, given how much overlap exists between the underlying constructs.

The take-home message is straightforward: targeting loneliness and social isolation, directly and indirectly, has real potential to build cognitive reserve, improve brain health outcomes, and improve quality of life and function for people at every stage, from prevention through to living well with dementia.

References

Bartley M, St. Sauver J, Schroeder D et al., Social Isolation and Healthcare Utilization in Older Adults Living With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in the United States, Innovation in Aging, Volume 8, Issue 10, 2024, igae081

Cardona M, Andrés P. Are social isolation and loneliness associated with cognitive decline in ageing? Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Feb 23;15:1075563. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1075563. PMID: 36909946; PMCID: PMC9995915.

Chamberlain SA, Savage R, Bronskill SE, Griffith LE, Rochon P, Batara J, Gruneir A. Examining the association between loneliness and emergency department visits using Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) data: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 22;22(1):69.

Chen LH, Lee OL, Lee YW, et al. Effectiveness of cognitive stimulation for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ Open2025;15:e090767. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2024-090767

Chen Y, Grodstein F, Capuano AW, Wang T, Bennett DA, James BD. Late-life social activity and subsequent risk of dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2025;21:e14316. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.14316

d’Oleire Uquillas F, Jacobs H, Biddle K et al. Regional tau pathology and loneliness in cognitively normal older adults. Tansl Psychiatry 8, 282 (2018)

Donovan NJ, Okereke OI, Vannini P, Amariglio RE, Rentz DM, Marshall GA, Johnson KA, Sperling RA. Association of Higher Cortical Amyloid Burden With Loneliness in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 1;73(12):1230-1237. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2657. PMID: 27806159; PMCID: PMC5257284.

Fan, K., Seah, B., Lu, Z., Wang, T., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Association between loneliness and mild cognitive impairment in older adults: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Aging & Mental Health, 28(12), 1650–1658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2024.2358079

Gardener H, Levin B, DeRosa J et al. Social connectivity is related to mild cognitive impairment and dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2021 84:1811-1820

Golden J, Conroy RM, Bruce I, Denihan A, Greene E, Kirby M, Lawlor BA. Loneliness, social support networks, mood and wellbeing in community-dwelling elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;24(7):694-700. doi: 10.1002/gps.2181. PMID: 19274642

Hajek A, König HH. Prevalence of loneliness and social isolation among individuals with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJPsych Open. 2025 Mar 11;11(2):e44. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.865. PMID: 40065726; PMCID: PMC12001938.

Hughes TF, Flatt JD, Fu B, Chang CC, Ganguli M. Engagement in social activities and progression from mild to severe cognitive impairment: the MYHAT study. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Apr;25(4):587-95. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002086. Epub 2012 Dec 21. PMID: 23257280; PMCID: PMC3578022.

Kelly, M.E., Duff, H., Kelly, S. et al.The impact of social activities, social networks, social support and social relationships on the cognitive functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review. Syst Rev 6, 259 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0632-2

Lam JA, Murray ER, Yu KE, Ramsey M, Nguyen TT, Mishra J, Martis B, Thomas ML, Lee EE. Neurobiology of loneliness: a systematic review. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Oct;46(11):1873-1887. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01058-7. Epub 2021 Jul 6. PMID: 34230607; PMCID: PMC8258736

Lawlor, B., Leavey, G., & Lubben, J. (2024). Do doctors appreciate that social isolation and loneliness are health issues? Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1477228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477228

Luanaigh CO, Lawlor BA. Loneliness and the health of older people. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;23(12):1213-21. doi: 10.1002/gps.2054. PMID: 18537197

Mahalingam G, Samtani S, Lam BCP, et al. Social connections and risk of incident mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and mortality in 13 longitudinal cohort studies of ageing. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023;19:5114-5128. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.

McHugh JE, Kenny RA, Lawlor BA, Steptoe A, Kee F. The discrepancy between social isolation and loneliness as a clinically meaningful metric: findings from the Irish and English longitudinal studies of ageing (TILDA and ELSA). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;32(6):664-674. doi: 10.1002/gps.4509. Epub 2016 Jun 1. PMID: 27246181

O'Luanaigh C, O'Connell H, Chin AV, Hamilton F, Coen R, Walsh C, Walsh JB, Caokley D, Cunningham C, Lawlor BA. Loneliness and cognition in older people: the Dublin Healthy Ageing study. Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(3):347-52. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.628977. Epub 2011 Nov 30. PMID: 22129350

Prohaska T, Burholt V, Burns A, et al Consensus statement: loneliness in older adults, the 21st century social determinant of health. BMJ Open 2020;10:e034967. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034967

Schnittger RI, Wherton J, Prendergast D, Lawlor BA. Risk factors and mediating pathways of loneliness and social support in community-dwelling older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(3):335-46. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.629092. Epub 2011 Nov 30. PMID: 22129431

Smith L, Shin JI, López Sánchez GF, Oh H, Kostev K, Jacob L, Law CT, Carmichael C, Tully MA, Koyanagi A. Social participation and mild cognitive impairment in low- and middle-income countries. Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107230.

Zou, C., Amos-Richards, D., Jagannathan, R. et al.Effect of home-based lifestyle interventions on cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr24, 200 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04798-5

 

Social Activity for Mild Cognitive Impairment: What the Evidence Shows